JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================^K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?$Uzןj^;Hɓsvۿj[\]QĨ͞ڥ}W>'PxtΣ'/4-ij#7ԼBXn:4NUi1KM3<'D WV~FWZ.Pj29ƼZ :g*q^7үK4RelUe-tcěpUc<5[|?ѭʒ=j[GPۗqZ ȟd\T>Bzw>qNSRN%͜kKh8mv{ŵ8#)w}4^G,I։̲JTuiKJIZxTNIZ$JUzUPd(&K 9Ǚt.-](/;X`x7ŷ"C/UI$A8N-G\>inV6S|f4RseA~tnq=A)Д؅&~Ay1pO3V_(ܛ=#W~gQWlqDYNJU,<և>,P7$'=^I00^z\CbQ,dJs]srN(#7;7.9=*5mdtzh];N ,> 0[67(V.JoTPu7s,;^0Ӵdo=yv4ɥ;asZVwG%y{PTh rM͗*GtB1 %tyu:sq\ZC7l繌\8|>sbsnk/Xl,6*^LIEKI??%;XȬD/pkGP!pV$5M#6*Oz<%f;TX؏ɮ8Dz1/611u9KVpU\cП]mnbV+f.+@#'+ڡO]Ie:ŜzMݱTkFsms 2(|zgVi~>M0IjA8uPxJI =j+:Y˛SQJf3WbO5 Nw=zN57T7> Й2w*ZyqxB_lxC]2kbū1>gU#8EA/bN t,TFyӅw'd9hE 4mBqx6waɶ8QYrTWia·zL&p1v5S.ڒy/YvS;(UMlI ic_+<(#](sO<(q؞TQjPb(b6cO0wV&C/F|ޞY@8QRZ?rwater weighing is one popular method which is considered accurate. The problem with this method is the cost. It certainly is not practical for high schools or most colleges. Other disadvantages of this system is the hassle of stripping down and submerging yourself in a tank. It is also difficult to administer and takes about 10 minutes to test.<br><br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of the cost. They are inexpensive but not very accurate. Another problem is the difficulty of reproducing results. In other words, there can be a wide variance of results between testers or even the same tester.<br><br>Ultrasonic systems are accurate and priced right but there is