JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?QEb3@(4bQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEbj\; .Nv4mmv'aQPqF)>JXxNjܯK-<-\K53 8_Y麥6*83gT#€f5krJv }HW#`YH43vg9˳lH@'=Ff--&}ќ*{G?Jzt']Q؁*[:/+[&14A-]4ȪGz˧gӣ}Qc砡66) wxիqX#Y 82O늫vP}I1dp+z :=ťISUmMG.%b_* *eIq[RP꒭K F@Rf.X#1nx1_zdj\IpFB88${^Y*k(kcz|)$r qLR?_Z(+ٙNqGgnQԣUە9YM_Z1X 黩{mq4 }9? 2K *4m̒H:TX,7bQSu֞m[0;ө YM}giQF pMtnJNȭ:҄n%=|d+Jw[;u8e2ҾM JO%Q۹VV u Yvfw=Nz\V*ln+ ]Jm2J2F~m9eeֹhIc<քnoH UV:$5~'MyL06AګxSWCIhvQ]UNAǥyt;LU6ZԌ2(853kKW~Ub!2a_m 1h1s 8ȫu&\| mj1~Q$'v=qڰ1Bs{uu&:")ֻVu*=V㍾`'8_z\ZW#n=I2Jtl3}s^a)?MLͲ%9$>~u)'= :a3SfuAF2}B3Y% #E(' z˙<ǭv/;Dz(8W .`ncĎ&!׭q-z̉<*.V/fu>]Ǒ}袱;xw?mŸi 1N$r=~6m%턆Kw1Rz Wd<br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of the cost. They are inexpensive but not very accurate. Another problem is the difficulty of reproducing results. In other words, there can be a wide variance of results between testers or even the same tester.<br><br>Ultrasonic systems are accurate and priced right but there is some burden to the subject and moderately difficult to operate. Also, testing cannot be done in under a minute like the new Tanita Scales. The IRI or infrared method has a lower price but has an accuracy problem. BIA or Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis is accurate but has a medium price and cannot be tested in under a minute.<br><br>The Tanita Analyzer uses the BIA process which sends a mild electrical current through the body to measure the impedance, or resistance to that current. Biological tiss