JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================aK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?ޟST,ͱ\9;}Kxdw=B6l+BI!rkqJr,g,'xmiU]2uևx/Cn3׽[i"(Fspr?eR&]B`HpGoozW N>#ѬHn)oZφmVYlA'8@9!s׃ת#[WNw'M.f*xGs|_L}㍁ק5|M2Go\v|jMbNy}2\c?p?U$:V)j¨2=lW97j#W]uSmSTed|os%6ܥg=䚍͆fW"fu' ׮*XK%U{2ҙuy=;NwySֳkkae7xߡڌ+{&$6"\$/Y/ءX z99ϭv #H>85Q] 7UҼfK pXfl'q翵IauyݽƛIt 6|`:u55=B~z/WO )Dfς[v95ȮȢSG'/Mu[=VIQʇ,ruk4{ڟ?nzK:*yMys" $P}kcYN_/3+%{ZmIW(osؼ9MP(¤JNvK$LO\<<3^{@`|12+UBJoKúw0WtȮ+J}Nچ+$#?Vg͡5F𷍢~I9Ri3jrJ/r׃nlm&E}\@64뗌pFkQK ZP1Tz6Jft9''78T8?hj1ZBl~5\xGJsjaz\:K1'ʃ=Jx&%TrF҄#OLТ+9)p1yϊ &+x9޻NJ+\bKðmn5OY6zjihpL^7CEƫvfyb-ɮDq LS8+{o"4;~=*i+6/ v uZ`!A4Uz$擩ĥ[Jk~S8N69/\2jHߊ}bk`'oᨴδy Ƙ*=N:avp3Uя8#;=Mz(1g6UX 9Ǹ=q5M{X8Ɵ"%󞾝+GQU2E8*ZT*]{Y"9ǸkfTs ?l 7=1iucnBKވk0 !&\$zR-f׵0[D$9W?_^ >3Ԡ]qxˤʑĻT u5pj䮔 %kR5;ng.6^aӐސ?J5<5q~ &l {^fb0LjJy17"z(0 /+Q|E \J5iC_X6+qB1XNkSholwQA5SӁEj <,?@?dDl@knͭ#qRxZ6V,n_e<ϥzf6r~Tn-\dkzQԢtCcan% ¨p@ ӠT`Iҷl2N<br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All three were essentially the same. DEXA s system uses x-rays and is extremely expensive.<br><br>Skin calipers are the most popular method because of te cost. They are inexpensive but not very accurate. Another problem is the difficulty of reproducing results. In other words, there can be a wide variance of results between testers or even the same tester.<br><br>Ultrasonic systems are accurate and priced right but there issome burden to the subject and moderately difficult to operate. Also, testing cannot be done in under a minute like the new Tanita Scales. The IRI or infrared method has a lower price but has an accuracy problem. BIA or Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis is accurate but has a medium price and cannot be t