JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================\K" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?HD;M$2!ϡR%+qV!FAs^S}EJu{-LۉH# mMN ؞wVwdWYgoa$@;UjՕ3j6b[N:Haʑe$݌)`"[BPnP~ͽMK##VgmdEA"s,=s^mf;hh<?J?Ȍ;+ɖIuA7qR C!KPsƻIr$d 9DZc+Z^irHdW `*EF9[AM2=I{UIE@B9=:T7,lHݸ\&w} ųF JƫNŚ`Ex$,8n nUV,2*=ů^_ҳnt)ϖd\2|n akt>abH>گI\ũCMR`95jZ+ReTyվdq^y4:"B0REswTi,-HUoLΫ U7g~v/(nfBo5c?_J-{Bl~ wϩ|(IC0=?OmbڥYZc;38ŵjsuhq$Zz 9A?gLCcn{<[iL#ZJvWr#Ų? ~*6I'$7Ys@P= kQtOujܺR=&ݢP##t0#֪KOWl>hg1$BOzzU}Pǖ͌JܱgU,cĚEY؁:r2u -pZ y \',b|# âBAN)'kC_Gȿxe[ZGM5Vv^=5WP^.<9 Ϝ{AV`1Ef}Y#-z]nR]&![Cs4o"1z{ӀS>YּsJM(3P4Ii45hs}Ủi(9TPOL< ֺ#F1zUqhJ&܂xr828u0x6 68ɪ r'=Fj7#1DC< ʠa檤?hzSoX= ޠiviR`0*Mu4bXdFÅU%Loͷ=CfOF+G`Z|GvgYou Measure Body Fat?<br><br>There are seven different methods to measure body fat. Hydrostatic or underwater weighing is one popular method which is considered accurate. The problem with this method is the cost. It certainly is not practical for high schools or most colleges. Other disadvantages of this system is the hassle of stripping down and submerging yourself in a tank. It is also difficult to administer and takes about 10 minutes to test.<br><br>DEXA is another accurate way to test body fat. I had this done on myself to compare the DEXA results with the hydrostatic method and the new Tanita Analyzer. All Division I colleges and high schools.<br>One organizational difference is the many two and three-sport athletes at the high school level. Many athletes are always in an in-season training cycle. This throws college periodization programs into an unmanageable situation. The primary in-season goal for a college program is to maintain. Should a 16-year old three-sport athlete always be in a maintenance cycle? Of course not! This would be absurd.<br>What if a Division I athlete misses a workout? He might lose his scholarship. How about the high school athlete? The BFS Program is designe