JFIFC    $ &%# #"(-90(*6+"#2D26;=@@@&0FKE>J9?@=C  =)#)==================================================VK" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?,0ܖoZ{X3A}mGE|dI$6g)7L+ ۊxGj|w!kf$NgjZ^GPİ+;W9ͨFP1]A> ֝֕pVž㯺xܺΣ)vLPKuhdPEkxL"t$oZ{+ZXY={QlzYk`ѽ0ǂxڠdzVѬl(A" .8=sTxQ*'mh-?w]$rzc>wr~nxvf 3#lŽpN~VGo|Ou$4,89'QG,pngUfR,J>ed~bb69r:l姯\WjZ[kNn'_z39xQN1:!sOX~P3Z:ψ5m7l㩮XO &#I䱭*,$#Qk9rIMDd+>VF݅WPAk],w}(TW޼9wҪsj+Mǖ?h^\HE\{Q-7E8ݰvյ&I.nI[}&485g^3U yMRaNF:Ȯ+ʹj3jeK6&JZwC# = v/$cT6\`w=vu<kiV+{=M*?SvZ.,ʒ X>B'˄^}+SRz~UjF1r7ûvs{h_jJquujUc9迕xQٰ͢٢\t(6UtaX`9?W3lrl+LW-: ,NXŠ*o\C8Wg ';Lj8Aj6O4$n}?Š+X-)J\ћE ˸yj{zWXuAnԜnOORs1#yyAQ\I?und Bench. No! These men are strong enough. A different focus should come into play.<br><br>Bottom Line: <br>High schools or colleges should never copy exactly a pro team's strength and conditioning program. The difference between these levels is staggering.<br><br>Best For Colleges: The vast majority of Division I colleges do something very similar to the BFS program. All the programs featured in this journal are quite similar. However, there are some major differences between Division I colleges and high schools.<br>One organizational difference is the many two and three-sport athletes at the high school level. Many athletes are always in an in-season training cycle. This throws college periodization programs into an unmanageable situation. The primary in-season goal for a college program is to maintain. Should a 16-year old three-sport athlete always be in a maintenance cycle? Of course not! This would be absurd.<br>What if a Division I athlete misses a workout? He might lose his scholarship. How about the high school athlete? The BFS Program is designed to create massive voluntary participation with daily increases of self confidence. It also flows easily from one sport to the next and unifies all sports into an easily managed total strength and conditioning program.<br>Division II, III, NAIA and junior college programs are